Answer
Why do AI assistants get facts about your business wrong?
Usually because the wrong version is published somewhere and the right one is not published anywhere.
Because something wrong is published and the correct version is not. Old directory entries, inconsistent listings and facts that were never written down anywhere all produce a confident wrong answer with no source to correct it.
The instinct on seeing a wrong answer is that the system invented it. Sometimes it did. Far more often it found something — an old address on a directory, a service you dropped two years ago, hours from before you changed them, a phone number from a previous premises — and reported it accurately from a source that is out of date. The error is real and its origin is usually external and correctable.
The most common cause is inconsistency across the places that describe you. A business listed with three different phone numbers across various directories, or two spellings of its name, or an old address on one aggregator, gives a system contradictory inputs. What it produces then is a plausible reconciliation, which may be any of the versions or a blend of them, and it will state whatever it produces with the same confidence as a correct answer.
The second cause is absence, and it is the one businesses can most directly fix. If a fact about your business is not published anywhere — your service area, what you do not do, your minimum, which of two similar services you actually offer — then no source exists to draw on, and the system will either decline or generalise from businesses like yours. Generalising produces the confidently generic answer that is wrong in the particular, and the remedy is to publish the fact plainly somewhere durable.
The third is a stale primary source, which is to say your own site. Pages that were accurate three years ago, a services list that includes something discontinued, a team page with people who left, a price that has changed. Your own site is normally weighted heavily, so an outdated fact there propagates rather than being corrected by anything else. Auditing your own pages for things that are simply no longer true is unglamorous and is the highest-return correction available.
Fixing this is a sequence rather than an appeal. Correct your own site first. Then correct the major directory and platform listings, which is tedious and finite, ensuring the name, address, phone number and category match exactly across them. Then publish the facts that were missing, plainly, in text. Then re-ask the question after a period, because these systems update on their own schedule and nothing about the fix is instant.
One thing worth accepting: you will not get a correction issued. There is generally no mechanism to tell a generated answer it is wrong, and the ones that exist are limited. What you can change is the evidence available, and the evidence is the published record. That is a slower remedy than a correction request and it is more durable, because it fixes the input rather than one output.
A generated answer about your business is assembled from what other people wrote about you, weighted by how consistently they wrote it.
Answer Production Engine, Context Theory
Related questions
Can we ask for a specific answer to be corrected?
Some platforms offer feedback mechanisms and their effect is limited and inconsistent. It costs little to use them for a materially damaging error. It is not a substitute for correcting the underlying published record, which is what the next answer will be assembled from regardless of whether any individual output was flagged.
How often should we check?
Quarterly is enough for most businesses, and the questions to ask are the ones a customer would: what does this business do, do they cover this area, what do they charge, are they open now. Checking the questions you wish people asked tells you very little, since those are not the ones being asked.
METHOD
Every figure below carries its source and the date it was verified. Nothing on this page is asserted.
The numbers on this page.
| What | Value | Specific to |
|---|---|---|
| AI-cited sources that also rank in the Google organic top 10 | 10% | Category-wide |
| Same, when an AI Overview is present | 83% | Category-wide |
| Buyers who eliminate vendors publishing no pricing, before contact | 60% | Category-wide |
2026 generative engine citation study · fewer than · verified
2026 zero-click search analysis · verified
2026 B2B buyer surveys · supersedes the 43% figure carried in blueprint v2 · verified
What is specific to this page.
| Kind | Claim | Check it against |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Most incorrect generated answers about a business report an out-of-date external source accurately rather than inventing a fact, with old directory entries, superseded hours and previous phone numbers the common origins. | Searching for the specific wrong detail to locate the published source that still carries it. |
| Software | Inconsistent name, address, phone number or category across directories supplies contradictory inputs, and the resulting reconciliation is stated with the same confidence as a correct answer. | The business's own listings across major directories, compared field by field for exact consistency. |
| Workflow | A fact that is published nowhere causes generalisation from similar businesses, which produces an answer that is confidently generic and wrong in the particular, and the remedy is to publish the fact plainly. | Asking an assistant a specific operational question about the business and checking whether the answer could apply to any competitor. |
| Software | A business's own site is weighted heavily, so an outdated fact on it propagates rather than being corrected by other sources, which makes auditing one's own pages the highest-return correction. | The business's own site, audited for services, prices, hours and personnel that are no longer current. |
Each row would be wrong on another industry's page. Where a sourced figure exists it is in the table above instead; these are the constraints that shape the work and do not happen to be numbers.
Start with the measurement.
Reading about a benchmark is not the same as knowing your own number. The audit produces yours, measured rather than estimated.
$497 · delivered in 5 business days · credited against month one